This morning, on Twitter, astronomer @adam_avison started the astronomy-themed hashtag #astromovies. The idea was to think of astronomical versions of movie titles and it has got pretty popular. I thought I'd share some of those that I liked.
Posted in
astro blog by Stuart on Thursday 26th Aug 2010 (
12:35 BST) |
Add a comment |
Permalink
I've mentioned Astronomy Visualization Metadata before as well as my attempts to make a microformat and include the object categories in LookUP results. It is an attempt to add useful astronomical information to astronomical image files ("pretty pictures") used on the web so that when someone downloads an astronomical image the information such as position, object name, observing frequencies etc go with it (unless it gets edited).
Recently, I've been thinking about the possibility of placing pretty pictures in Chromoscope. This is already possible in the WorldWideTelescope plug-in but getting it to work in a normal browser requires a bit of effort. The idea isn't fully fledged yet but, to make it even tennable, I had to be able to extract the metadata from the image within the web-browser.
A few weeks ago I discovered a nice Javascript library that reads EXIF information from images. This was a good start but I soon discovered that it didn't read the AVM data as it isn't stored in the same way as the EXIF information. After a bit of head scratching, and reading the Adobe XMP specifications, I was able to adapt the EXIF Javascript library to read AVM data too. I've created a test page with a few images on it to check that it works. Thanks to @kimberlykowal for helping check the Chandra image.
Posted in
astro blog by Stuart on Tuesday 24th Aug 2010 (
19:28 BST) |
Add a comment |
Permalink
Most people who've done an astronomy course will have heard of the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram. It was developed to show the relationships between the temperature (or colour) of a star and its luminosity. The other week I saw a tweet referring to someone as an "astronomy media star". This interesting stellar classification got me thinking about an alternative version of the H-R diagram. In my alternate reality I imagined a version classifying astronomers* and so, after a little consultation with other astronomers (thanks Sarah, Tess, Mike, Paul and Amanda) and some free time**, I present...
Click to embiggen. Apologies to Hertzsprung and Russell. If you are one of the names on this plot and you feel your numbers are very wrong,
let me know and I'll update it. CREDIT: Stuart
This isn't in any way supposed to be accurate - it is qualitative - and most of the "Main Career Sequence" is invented based on expectations of an evolutionary sequence assuming little use of the internet before becoming an astronomer. Mega-stars such as Dr Brian May may follow a totally different path. Of course, not all astronomers make it along the main sequence and many go off to other jobs through either an "academia runaway" or a "funding instability crisis". The "dark astronomers" (we have dark matter and dark energy so why not?) are theorised to exist but haven't been directly detected so if you have evidence for one, please let me know.
For those wanting technical details, the data for the red stars comes from NASA's
ADS/SPIRES-HEP (limited to peer review) and searching for the person's name (in quotation marks) on Google. Both numbers are affected by name-sake contamination and the
Google-dance/search customisation adds to the uncertainty on the y-axis.
Update 2010-07-22T11:10:00 UT: It turns out that Google gives wildly different results depending on which Google you are connected to. Being in the UK I was automatically redirected to google.co.uk and that is where these numbers come from. Google.com seems to produce more search results. I may re-make this plot using Google.com as the standard.
If anyone has the time to properly classify a few hundred astronomers you are welcome to do that and send me the data!
* I know Brian Cox is technically a particle physicist but he is the Sun Professor which makes him almost a solar physicist ;-)
** Internet-based diversions such as this usually result in people saying "he has too much free time". That is not entirely inaccurate.
Posted in
astro blog by Stuart on Wednesday 21st Jul 2010 (
12:36 BST) |
33 Comments |
Permalink
This morning, the European Space Agency and the Planck Consortium released the Planck satellite's first view of the entire sky. Behold.
A false-colour image of the whole sky as seen by Planck. The dust throughout the Galaxy is shown in blue. In the background, the mottled yellow features are relic radiation, called the Cosmic Microwave Background, which contains information about the earliest stages of the Universe. This image is a low-resolution version of the full data set.
CREDIT: ESA, Planck LFI and HFI Consortia (2010)
was launched on May 14th 2009 and, after three months of travelling and instrument testing, started taking science data in August last year. Early on we were treated to
first light images, an image of
cold dust around the Galactic Centre, and
patches of the sky near Orion and Perseus. Now, for the first time, we get to see a view of the entire sky as seen by Planck.
Planck's main task is to study the echoes of the Big Bang; the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation. It builds on the successes of
COBE and
WMAP that have gone before but covers a much bigger range of frequencies (30-857 GHz) and will ultimately be more sensitive. The range of frequencies is very important as it helps to disentangle the many sources of microwave radiation in the Universe that detract from the cosmological signal that Planck is trying to observe.
Today's image may vaguely resemble the Flying Spaghetti Monster* but actually shows our galaxy - the Milky Way - across the middle and you can see streamers of cold gas and dust in our local neighbourhood (local means within a few hundred light years) stretching above and below it. To get your bearings, there is
an annotated version and you can also
explore it in Chromoscope! Near the top and bottom of the image you'll see a mottled pattern. That is a glimpse of the CMB; the remains of the fireball out of which our Universe sprang into existence 13.7 billion years ago.
This image is only the start of the amazing data that is to come from Planck. Planck is imaging the entire sky every 8 months or so and that means it produces lots of data. There is plenty of work ahead, and at least two full surveys of the sky are required to fully calibrate everything, so the first cosmological science isn't expected until 2012. In a couple of years, we should expect to see a much better and higher resolution view of the Universe. Meanwhile, my congratulations to all the people that have worked on Planck over the past 20 years. The hard work was certainly worth it.
* It doesn't help that the filename contains "FSM" (which actually stands for "full-sky map").
Posted in
astro blog by Stuart on Monday 05th Jul 2010 (
09:05 BST) |
4 Comments |
Permalink
Yesterday I made a minor change and added a feature to LookUP. First, the change. I realised that the images I was using from Flickr included copyright images so I've limited the search to those with licenses that allow them to be included in the LookUP results. Unfortunately, that does reduce the number of images and removes quite a few of the nice astrophotography shots. If you have a Flickr account and astro photographs, please consider using a permissable license and using astrotags.
While getting my head around astrotags I remembered another project I created that made use of tags on blog posts. I realised that I could make use of SpaceBuzz to add a list of blog posts about the object. Of course this relies on bloggers tagging their posts. If you blog about astronomy, make sure you tag your posts with the name of any astronomical objects you mention and then you'll appear in the LookUP results. Here is an example for Titan.
With all the cross-links I now have between Chromoscope, SpaceBuzz and LookUP, it's almost as if I created them with a plan.
Posted in
astro blog by Stuart on Wednesday 30th Jun 2010 (
11:43 BST) |
Add a comment |
Permalink
