APOD Search

In my last post I mentioned I'd made a search engine for Astronomy Picture of the Day. I've added a few improvements since last week:

  • As well as individual words (and negated words), a search can now include phrases by putting them in quotation marks e.g. "hubble space telescope".
  • You can view the results in a compact grid view as well as a list view.
  • I've added an "Advanced" tab that lets you search by position on the sky (e.g. 05:35:18.9, -05:39:25.7) as well as by type of object using the AVM taxonomy (e.g. interacting galaxies)
  • The results are now paged (50 results per page) so that your browser isn't overwhelmed by thousands of images.
  • As I have to stretch the tiny thumbnails to the same height, wide-aspect images became very pixelated. In those cases, I replace the image with a higher resolution version after the page loads.
  • Searching by word, phrase, position and object type can all be combined to limit the results.
  • If there are no results you now get a message telling you that!
That is it for now but if anyone has any suggestions for improvements let me know.

Tags: | |
Posted in astro blog by Stuart on Monday 14th Oct 2013 (18:32 BST) | 2 Comments | Permalink

Comments: APOD Search

We have apod search for decade. Nothing special, we make use full-text search capability of PostgreSQL. We could use dictionary of astronomical names, so one may find supernovae by 'sn', for example. Do you know some ?

Oleg

Posted by Oleg Bartunov on Monday 14th Oct 2013 (19:07 UTC)

Forgot URL:

http://www.astronet.ru/db/xware/apod.html

Posted by Oleg Bartunov on Monday 14th Oct 2013 (19:08 UTC)

ADD A COMMENT:


Don't provide an email/URL unless really necessary as your comment may get caught in the spam filter. No URLs get turned into links so don't bother. The ground rules for commenting are:
  1. No profanity or personal attacks please. Keep it clean.
  2. Restrict comments to subjects relevant to the post.
  3. Don't mention Pluto. If you do it'll be replaced by Goofy.
  4. No spam i.e. anything commercial unrelated to astronomy.
  5. If you think you've discovered a Theory of Everything, a replacement to Relativity, or something similar then please publish it in a journal rather than in my comments.
Comments against the spirit of these ground rules may be removed.











* required fields