Hubble finds planets

The Hubble Space Telescope appears to have found 16 extrasolar planets - planets orbiting stars other than the Sun - that are all around 26,000 light years away from the Earth near the centre of our Galaxy. That is a pretty amazing feat and, if they are all confirmed, will add to the ever increasing list of exoplanets which currently stands at 208.

Hubble spots planets
HST view of the Sagittarius Window. The field contains approximately 150,000 stars, down to 30th magnitude. Green circles identify stars orbited by planets CREDIT: NASA, ESA, K. Sahu (STScI) and the SWEEPS science team
The latest slew of planets were found by the Sagittarius Window Eclipsing Extrasolar Planet Search (SWEEPS) in the central bulge of our galaxy. The region of sky covered by SWEEPS has an angular area less than two percent of that of the full Moon and contained 180,000 stars! The planets that were found were not actually directly imaged; they were found by the transit method which spots the slight dip in light from the parent star when a planet passes in front of it. Of course, this method only finds those planets which happen to pass between us and their star which is a very small fraction of the total number that are likely to be out there.

Taking into account the difficulty in detecting planets at that distance and the tiny fraction that can be found using the transit method, the team claim that this supports the hypothesis that the Milky Way contains around 6 billion Jupiter-sized planets. That is about one for every 30 or so stars. I don't know what the uncertainty on that extrapolation is and I wouldn't have thought you could be too confident extrapolating from 16 to 6 billion. I'll have to wait until the results are published in the journal Nature tomorrow to find out what the uncertainty on that figure is. Still, finding 16 planets is good going.

Tags: |
Posted in astro blog by Stuart on Wednesday 04th Oct 2006 (19:04 BST) | 5 Comments | Permalink

Comments: Hubble finds planets

I think, that with using of new optical elements it is possible to made telescope better then Hubble

Posted by Diffractive Optics on Thursday 05th Oct 2006 (13:22 UTC)

It certainly is possible to make telescopes better than Hubble. There are larger telescopes with better optics on the ground but they are limited due to the Earth's atmosphere. Space telescopes don't have that problem. Hubble's successor is due to be launched in a few years time.

Posted by Stuart on Thursday 05th Oct 2006 (15:55 UTC)

I don't know, that does seem like quite a stretch, but then 180 K stars in an area 2 percent of a full moon...It could be.

Posted by Tom on Sunday 08th Oct 2006 (17:01 UTC)

I don't know, that does seem like quite a stretch, but then 180 K stars in an area 2 percent of a full moon...It could be.

Posted by Tom on Sunday 08th Oct 2006 (17:05 UTC)

this is a beautiful picture for the kids to see, how the hubble took a picture of outer space.. Awsome.. See what God made..

Posted by Debbie Abdalla on Thursday 29th Jan 2009 (13:02 UTC)

ADD A COMMENT:


Your email address will not be displayed on the website and will certainly not be passed on to any other websites or organisations. Only add it if you really want to. The ground rules for commenting are:
  1. No profanity or personal attacks please. Keep it clean.
  2. Please restrict comments to the subject of the post or relevant topics.
  3. Be light-hearted if at all possible.
  4. No spam. That includes adverts for products, pills and services that are unrelated to astronomy.
Comments that go against the spirit of these ground rules may be removed.











* required fields